# of Words: 362

Back in 1897, Bram Stoker took fundamental European folk stories and turned them into one of the most well-known horror books of all time. However, the CW is not going to be speccing a script about this man anytime soon--at least, not Dracula as Stoker composed him. Stoker's Dracula is not young and sparkly-hot; he is creepy, old, also has a penchant for turning into bats and clouds of mist.

Creepy, older, and occasionally downright dull (only stop with the rail schedules, Mina)--yes. But just like any vampire stories we can name coughVampireDiaries cough, Dracula is far more interesting to talk about than it is to read. The same as today, vampires in 1897 stood in for a whole lot of contemporary fears and anxieties. Except while the vampire craze of the 2000s could be read as representing anxieties of corruption and conspiracy theories, ye olde turn-of-the-century bloodsuckers represented the increasing globalization of London, the dangers of sexual activity, as well as the increasing presence of technology.

That is right: technology. Much enjoy this creaky rom-com You've Got Mailhinges on the newest technology of email, Dracula hinges on telegraphs, typewriters, and phonographs--only with a lot more grotesque results.

"Invasion literature," or literature which had to do with monsters invading the British Empire (which, at that point, still covered lots of the planet beyond the British Isles), was remarkably popular in the time. Writers such as Rudyard Kipling, H.G. Wells, and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle all composed sensational adventure stories about fantastic animals or threatening monsters from around the world. Stoker did not think about himself as a excellent performer; he was mostly a businessman. He handled the famous Lyceum Theatre at London. Stoker only wrote novels to cover the invoices (hah! The notion of writing novels to cover the invoices is mad). Honestly, he would most likely be astonished at the lasting effect Dracula has had. He composed it in a piecemeal, haphazard way--just a bit here, a bit there.

It wasn't until later in the 20th century, even when movie versions of the novel started to appear, that the novel's popularity really skyrocketed and its effects on popular culture became crystal-clear.

Related Papers

The Grapes Of Wrath John Steinbeck

The Grapes of Wrath pretty much has a V.I.P. pass to each "Top 100 Books of All Time" list in the world. It is a massive deal. It won the Pulitzer Prize in 1940 and aided John Steinbeck nab the Nobel Prize in 1962--they gave Steinbeck the Nobel for (among other things) that his "keen social perception." This comprehension of society's ills is razor sharp, and cuts deep. And lots of this has to do with the fact that this novel is brutally honest. In the time of the Dust Bowl, when tens of......Read More

East Of Eden John Steinbeck

He has written about mice and men, and a few wrathful grapes, however at his novel East of Eden, John Steinbeck sets his sights a bit high and takes on the Book of Genesis. That is right--our guy Steinbeck might have been writing in 1952 and based his story during that awkward time when the 19th century became the 20th, but his subject matter comes from manner further back. But even though Steinbeck stepped into religious territory, Easy of Eden is still chock full of all the classic Steinbeck......Read More

The Devil In The White City Erik Larson

We are guessing you did not encounter a book called The Devil in the White City and think, "Aha! This sounds like a fun and lighthearted read!" And it is great that you're not hoping to read something uplifting--this is not a book for individuals that wish to feel warm n' fuzzy inside. He is handsome. He is suave. He has a large house in Chicago. He is the definition of a lady-killer. Before 20th-century serial killers such as Ted Bundy and John Wayne Gacy made headlines (and accusations)......Read More

Related Topics