# of Words: 362

Back in 1897, Bram Stoker took fundamental European folk stories and turned them into one of the most well-known horror books of all time. However, the CW is not going to be speccing a script about this man anytime soon--at least, not Dracula as Stoker composed him. Stoker's Dracula is not young and sparkly-hot; he is creepy, old, also has a penchant for turning into bats and clouds of mist.

Creepy, older, and occasionally downright dull (only stop with the rail schedules, Mina)--yes. But just like any vampire stories we can name coughVampireDiaries cough, Dracula is far more interesting to talk about than it is to read. The same as today, vampires in 1897 stood in for a whole lot of contemporary fears and anxieties. Except while the vampire craze of the 2000s could be read as representing anxieties of corruption and conspiracy theories, ye olde turn-of-the-century bloodsuckers represented the increasing globalization of London, the dangers of sexual activity, as well as the increasing presence of technology.

That is right: technology. Much enjoy this creaky rom-com You've Got Mailhinges on the newest technology of email, Dracula hinges on telegraphs, typewriters, and phonographs--only with a lot more grotesque results.

"Invasion literature," or literature which had to do with monsters invading the British Empire (which, at that point, still covered lots of the planet beyond the British Isles), was remarkably popular in the time. Writers such as Rudyard Kipling, H.G. Wells, and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle all composed sensational adventure stories about fantastic animals or threatening monsters from around the world. Stoker did not think about himself as a excellent performer; he was mostly a businessman. He handled the famous Lyceum Theatre at London. Stoker only wrote novels to cover the invoices (hah! The notion of writing novels to cover the invoices is mad). Honestly, he would most likely be astonished at the lasting effect Dracula has had. He composed it in a piecemeal, haphazard way--just a bit here, a bit there.

It wasn't until later in the 20th century, even when movie versions of the novel started to appear, that the novel's popularity really skyrocketed and its effects on popular culture became crystal-clear.

Related Papers

Angela's Ashes Frank McCourt

Well, it is certainly not a genie in a bottle or a space filled with Grammy awards or a museum in Ireland. It is the archetypal rags-to-riches caliber of their stories. It is when a generally obscure person rises from poverty to Gatsbyesquewealth and fame. Our boy Frank McCourt, a child from the slums of Limerick who suffers from starvation and poverty during the majority of his early life, went on to win the Pulitzer Prize in his robe because of his comic memoir (yeah, that is right--comedian),......Read More

The Handmaid's Tale Margaret Atwood

The name The Handmaid's Tale sounds sort of... perky. Like it may be a saucy portion of the life 'n' times of a Christmas. Or a zany romp where many servants compare the goings-on of their companies. Words such as perky, saucy, and zany would never Be utilized to describe the contents of Margaret Atwood's most renowned work. Instead, this novel might be classified as frightening, gloomy, and cruel and unusual. The Handmaid's Tale, a best-selling book first released in 1985, was advertised as a......Read More

The Heart Is A Lonely Hunter Carson McCullers

Carson McCullers makes us feel just like slackers. She also wrote and published her first novel, The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter at 1940, when she was twenty-three years old. Yeah. The novel was a breakout hit and jump-started McCullers' exceptionally successful literary career. During the upcoming twenty-ish decades, she wrote novels, short stories, plays, reviews, articles, poems, as well as Hollywood scripts. In case you were not impressed enough already, she did all of this while combating......Read More

Related Topics