# of Words: 885

There is no doubt that convictions and opinions concerning the simple fact that no one is given the right to take a person's own life. The reasons of the debate that is said could possibly be religious, religious, and medical, but what is important is the preservation of life except when circumstances that are inescapable require otherwise.

This paper will tackle euthanasia or assisted suicide was seen by the society in general. It is going to also discuss why euthanasia is advantageous and disadvantageous for a person who wants the exact same. Euthanasia was known as mercy killing because of its characteristic as an assisted suicide.

Knowing the history of the mercy killing will add our knowledge of the exact same, but not really augment the value of the discussions on each side. In areas like Germany that was once dominated by Adolf Hitler, euthanasia was heavily followed that basically gives permission to terminate the life span of patients who suffer from debilitating disorders. There are principles to be able to permit euthanasia in the context of permitting to ruin a life that is unworthy of life. These primary rules include the presence of advisory board which will review each case of mercy killing, the permission on the part of the patient to withdraw such request for assisted suicide and mercy killing must be done under sensible and controlled conditions.

It is crucial that legal protection be given to the physician who assisted the patient to die. But before to the said situation in Germany, early historical accounts on euthanasia already exist to haunt the society. The Greek Doctor named Hippocrates who existed for about 400 B. C. Back gave an oath of interest to the dis-allowance of giving medicine that could end a that is unworthy life. From up to 20th century, the English Common Law considered champion killing as improper and that any one who assisted suicide is going to be considered as guilty of murder as principal.

Throughout the 19th century, it was even a principle in both American and English customs that criminals or prisoners who asked another person to assist him for suicide is going to be tried despite the impending schedule for execution. However, in present time, these principles against euthanasia is being examined and studied due to the advent of convincing and powerful arguments which encouraged mercy killing. The historical perspective of euthanasia is the Hippocratic Oath which sided on patient attention what the consequences may be.

However, as time goes by, to die with dignity is just what some patients shout when suffering debilitating illness. As like the advent on ethics of patients care has been examined to give way for patients will. As for political sides, the Republicans in the USA are contrary to mercy killing while the Democrats support it. Another debate is that, mercy killing may only impact one person and it is not reasonable that other folks will prevent the same. Anyhow, the person who requested for mercy killing desired it to happen in order to ease the pain. The opinions of other individuals concerning the morality and practicability of euthanasia do no thing when the patient who's suffering pain decided that step needs to be taken in his favor.

Although it is correct that we do not have the right take one's lifetime, it is acceptable that we do not have the right to let a person suffer with indescribable pain due to terminal illness. If fairness and dignity are the things which make a society whole, then why should we allow a patient to make indignity due to a terminal illness? Our responsibility is to burden things and apply logic and reason aside from comprehending the entire issue. Without doing so, we will lose the very essence of imitating the legislation and implementing equity and justice. It is unfair to force a patient to endure pain when he will no longer bear it while being alive.

Thus, euthanasia or assisted suicide must rescue such patient. Religious groups will opine that euthanasia is incorrect. Politicians are also at the hot seat to debate on the legality and necessity of mercy killing. The culture as a whole is still hoping to study the subject as it was never an easy or common practice. In addition, there are things that must be considered in arguing about euthanasia.

First, is the will of the patient to die beneath the debilitating suffering of a terminal illness and second, is the ethical standard on patient care. The two topics are hard to reconcile because there are advantages and disadvantages of euthanasia. The principal disadvantage of mercy killing is the simple fact that it has been mistreated and abused by the people who are involved in it. But, mercy killing is quite important to aid a patient that is experiencing pain due to terminal illness. It is practical to end a life of a patient that suffers too much strain which proves to be unbearable. But this should be done honestly from the attending physician for the Hippocratic Oath which states that mischievous acts against patients shouldn't be done remains enforced up to this present time.

Therefore, it is the responsibility of the individuals involved on euthanasia to utilize all reasonable ideas and ethical criteria to conduct the same.

Related Papers

An Argument in Favor of Euthanasia

There is no doubt that convictions and opinions concerning the simple fact that no one is given the right to take a person's own life. The reasons of the debate that is said could possibly be religious, religious, and medical, but what is important is the preservation of life except when circumstances that are inescapable require otherwise. This paper will tackle euthanasia or assisted suicide was seen by the society in general. It is going to also discuss why euthanasia is advantageous and......Read More

An Arguments Against and in Favor of Euthanasia

According to a poll from the Harris Poll, 96 percent of Americans support the use of video surveillance in public areas from the authorities and law enforcement agencies to prevent terrorism. Of course we all know that video surveillance is employed for more than simply preventing terrorism, but also to keep an eye in our homes and businesses, on roads, in parks and at other areas. So what are some of the arguments for the use of surveillance systems across the nation? .1. Peace of Mind - A......Read More

An Analysis of the Issue of Euthanasia and Its Legalization

It is common for homeowners to have a home that's "upside down", most with first and second mortgages. Houses that were purchased a number of years ago valued rapidly in a short period of time and it was easy to pull on the home's equity . That equity might have been utilized for many purposes, including home improvements, constructing a swimming pool, financing college educations, purchasing new automobiles or ships, paying off credit cards and investing in businesses. These are second loans......Read More

Related Topics