# of Words: 386

Have you ever been on a vacation that simply did not go well? Maybe you got food poisoning, or you struggled with your loved ones, or got bad news in the home? Or maybe you found your boss' illegitimate kid and long-lost spouse, brought them home with you, and continued to harness them before your lifetime fully unraveled? Alright, maybe we are getting a bit too special here.

However, this vacation-gone-wrong is pretty much exactly what happens to bad Bernard Marx at Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.

Huxley first published this novel in 1932, but the story takes place far from the future, where government-sanctioned medication use and massive people orgies occur on the routine. Sound attractive? Not too fast.

As we immediately find out, the future is not all it's chalked up to be.Individuality is something of the past, infants are made in test tubes, and everyone lives in a caste society of clones and "Alphas."

The story follows Bernard Marx, an Alpha that simply can not figure out how to match. Within this future of genetic modification and rigorously stratified society, Bernard is as close something to a individual you'll encounter. The only issue?

As you may imagine, Bernard experiences all kinds of issues as a result of the identity. When Bernard takes a romantic vacation to the Reservation--a crude region of New Mexico the future never attained--The Director not-so-kindly allows Bernard know he should not plan on coming back to work because he is being deported to some distant island.

We don't wish to give away too much just yet, but let us just say things take an interesting turn when Bernard experiences The Director's long-lost spouse and son on the Reservation. So it is pretty controversial that the big-shot Director broke the standard and fathered a kid(gasp! ).

We can not say this book has quite a happy ending, but it does raise a whole lot of significant questions about individuality, individual character, and the downfalls of technological advancement. The novel is often compared to a considerably subsequent novel, Orwell's 1984, because the two undertake similar dystopian issue matter, only in various lights.

Is the future so bright we need to wear shades? Or can it be so dim that we should thank our lucky stars Huxley's predictions have not really come true?

Related Papers

Everyday Use Alice Walker

It is pretty fitting that Alice Walker's "Regular Use" is contained in a brief story collection known as In Love and Trouble. You know, because it has got love... and difficulty, trouble, trouble. Walker released this collection of stories in 1973, just a decade before she won the Pulitzer Prize for just a tiny book you have heard of predicted The Color Purple. Like this super famous novel, "Regular Use" explores African women's struggles with racial identity and racism through a particularly......Read More

The Catcher In The Rye J. D. Salinger

Over the course of 3 days, a rich kid who can not stop getting expelled from every college he attends wanders around Manhattan trying to get (1) drunk and (2) lucky. No, it's not the storyline of an unreleased Gossip Girl season (RIP). It is the storyline of Catcher in the Rye, J. D. Salinger's beloved, prohibited, reviled, worshiped, and--well, let us just say polarizing 1951 novel about a depressed prep school boy with a heart of gold. After rocketing almost immediately to the top of the......Read More

Gulliver's Travels Jonathan Swift

You may have heard folks call Gulliver's Travels that a satire. A satire is a (generally humorous) fictional work which uses sarcasm and irony to poke fun in the general patheticness of humankind -- our weakness, our stupidity, all that jazz. But if you love twenty-first century satire (like we do), you need to check out the eighteenth century -- these men were huge supporters of a fantastic satire. In actuality, a number of the greatest thinkers of the twentieth century, such as poet Alexander......Read More

Related Topics