# of Words: 386

Have you ever been on a vacation that simply did not go well? Maybe you got food poisoning, or you struggled with your loved ones, or got bad news in the home? Or maybe you found your boss' illegitimate kid and long-lost spouse, brought them home with you, and continued to harness them before your lifetime fully unraveled? Alright, maybe we are getting a bit too special here.

However, this vacation-gone-wrong is pretty much exactly what happens to bad Bernard Marx at Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.

Huxley first published this novel in 1932, but the story takes place far from the future, where government-sanctioned medication use and massive people orgies occur on the routine. Sound attractive? Not too fast.

As we immediately find out, the future is not all it's chalked up to be.Individuality is something of the past, infants are made in test tubes, and everyone lives in a caste society of clones and "Alphas."

The story follows Bernard Marx, an Alpha that simply can not figure out how to match. Within this future of genetic modification and rigorously stratified society, Bernard is as close something to a individual you'll encounter. The only issue?

As you may imagine, Bernard experiences all kinds of issues as a result of the identity. When Bernard takes a romantic vacation to the Reservation--a crude region of New Mexico the future never attained--The Director not-so-kindly allows Bernard know he should not plan on coming back to work because he is being deported to some distant island.

We don't wish to give away too much just yet, but let us just say things take an interesting turn when Bernard experiences The Director's long-lost spouse and son on the Reservation. So it is pretty controversial that the big-shot Director broke the standard and fathered a kid(gasp! ).

We can not say this book has quite a happy ending, but it does raise a whole lot of significant questions about individuality, individual character, and the downfalls of technological advancement. The novel is often compared to a considerably subsequent novel, Orwell's 1984, because the two undertake similar dystopian issue matter, only in various lights.

Is the future so bright we need to wear shades? Or can it be so dim that we should thank our lucky stars Huxley's predictions have not really come true?

Related Papers

Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep? Philip K. Dick

The matter about Philip K. Dick's opinion on reality is the fact that it only remains reality as long as you don't blink. In that respect, his novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Is sort of just like a three-shell game. Take your eyes off Dick's shifting, twisting, and shuffling palms for a second, and you never know what you'll find beneath the cup: a android posing as a flesh-and-blood person, a movie-star turned galactic deity, or a once bustling town turned grey atomic wasteland?......Read More

Grendel John Gardner

Now's the time to ask yourself what you really know about heroes. No, really: what do you know to be true about them? Got it? Now collect all that up into a little mental sack and throw it from your mind. Inside this Grendel, Gardner--a pretty challenging guy in real life, too--compels us to look closely at what we've believed about noble behavior since the earliest of times. And what better means to do this than to go back to Beowulf, the earliest epic poem composed in (what passes for)......Read More

The Clouds Aristophanes

Think that John Oliver devised the art of providing a healthy dose of cultural opinion when making folks laugh? Nope, sorry--folks have been doing this for centuries, also Aristophanes is one of the masters. His comment about the philosopher Socrates (who appears as a personality) was so pointed that a few (like any unknown dude named Plato) believed that the play was responsible for producing the bad rep which eventually got Socrates attempted and implemented. Consequently, in the event that......Read More

Related Topics