# of Words: 386

Have you ever been on a vacation that simply did not go well? Maybe you got food poisoning, or you struggled with your loved ones, or got bad news in the home? Or maybe you found your boss' illegitimate kid and long-lost spouse, brought them home with you, and continued to harness them before your lifetime fully unraveled? Alright, maybe we are getting a bit too special here.

However, this vacation-gone-wrong is pretty much exactly what happens to bad Bernard Marx at Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.

Huxley first published this novel in 1932, but the story takes place far from the future, where government-sanctioned medication use and massive people orgies occur on the routine. Sound attractive? Not too fast.

As we immediately find out, the future is not all it's chalked up to be.Individuality is something of the past, infants are made in test tubes, and everyone lives in a caste society of clones and "Alphas."

The story follows Bernard Marx, an Alpha that simply can not figure out how to match. Within this future of genetic modification and rigorously stratified society, Bernard is as close something to a individual you'll encounter. The only issue?

As you may imagine, Bernard experiences all kinds of issues as a result of the identity. When Bernard takes a romantic vacation to the Reservation--a crude region of New Mexico the future never attained--The Director not-so-kindly allows Bernard know he should not plan on coming back to work because he is being deported to some distant island.

We don't wish to give away too much just yet, but let us just say things take an interesting turn when Bernard experiences The Director's long-lost spouse and son on the Reservation. So it is pretty controversial that the big-shot Director broke the standard and fathered a kid(gasp! ).

We can not say this book has quite a happy ending, but it does raise a whole lot of significant questions about individuality, individual character, and the downfalls of technological advancement. The novel is often compared to a considerably subsequent novel, Orwell's 1984, because the two undertake similar dystopian issue matter, only in various lights.

Is the future so bright we need to wear shades? Or can it be so dim that we should thank our lucky stars Huxley's predictions have not really come true?

Related Papers

East Of Eden John Steinbeck

He has written about mice and men, and a few wrathful grapes, however at his novel East of Eden, John Steinbeck sets his sights a bit high and takes on the Book of Genesis. That is right--our guy Steinbeck might have been writing in 1952 and based his story during that awkward time when the 19th century became the 20th, but his subject matter comes from manner further back. But even though Steinbeck stepped into religious territory, Easy of Eden is still chock full of all the classic Steinbeck......Read More

Barn Burning William Faulkner

"Barn Burning" is a brief story by American writer William Faulkner. It was first published in Harpers in June of 1939. (Click here to see the situation. ) Faulkner, winner of a Nobel Prize for literature, and two Pulitzer Prizes, is a literary giant, best known for his novels As I Lay Dying and The Sound and the Fury, also for the Brief story "A Rose for Emily." Like "Emily," "Barn Burning" is often taught and anthologized. It won the O. Henry prize the season it was printed, and has been......Read More

The Handmaid's Tale Margaret Atwood

The name The Handmaid's Tale sounds sort of... perky. Like it may be a saucy portion of the life 'n' times of a Christmas. Or a zany romp where many servants compare the goings-on of their companies. Words such as perky, saucy, and zany would never Be utilized to describe the contents of Margaret Atwood's most renowned work. Instead, this novel might be classified as frightening, gloomy, and cruel and unusual. The Handmaid's Tale, a best-selling book first released in 1985, was advertised as a......Read More

Related Topics