# of Words: 972

Since 1992, the number of Muslims who've been allowed to immigrate to the United States from Middle-Eastern nations has inexorably doubled. In 2014, approximately 200, 000 Muslims seeking naturalization emigrated into the United States. This terrific number of first generation Muslims is disproportionate to the much smaller number of Muslims who sought naturalization before 1980.

At this time, there are approximately 2.75 million Muslims practicing the Muslim religion in the USA, of whom sixty-three percent are first-generation immigrants who travelled through the naturalization process for U.S. Citizenship. That usually means that 37 percent of the present 2.75 million Muslims have been born on U.S.

Soil to naturalized Muslim parents since the high-tide of Muslim immigration started. These facts are problematic in terms of why these naturalized Muslims are presently in the United States, and why their birth-rate has been so staggeringly for more than twenty decades. As to why zealous Islamists, who leave the Koran (the holy text of Islam) and sharia law as the rigid codes governing their behaviors, might want to reside in a democratic republic whose Constitution and Bill of Rights are totally opposed to Islamic law, the very obvious might be the correct representation of their intentions.

Perhaps they come back to the United States to assimilate and acculturate into American society, and to accept, honor, and protect authorities, or are they coming into this number to the republic for vastly different and sinister reason? . Have you ever considered what a person must conscientiously do, and say, to become a naturalized citizen of the United States? By way of example, an eighteen-year old man, a devout Muslim in Pakistan, who has immigrated to the USA to become a U.S. Citizen, must take an oath of allegiance prior to the conferral of U.S. Citizenship on him personally, as required by U.S.

Law. The oath appears below. "I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the regulation; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the regulation; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God." .

If this eighteen-year old devout Muslim was taught, from the cradle-up, that the Islamic Muslim code of conduct and sharia law transcends, and therefore trumps, any other code of human conduct required by law, that person, when swearing he will bear true faith and allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, is verbally committing himself to something that he will ultimately refuse to do; this is, support and protect the U.S. Constitution. That makes every Muslim who is, or who has ever been, naturalized a U.S. Citizen really suspect, because the Koran, the Muslim holy book, is hardly a book of tolerance and enjoy.

Truly, the Koran is, ratherthan a book of violence and hatred directed against the infidel, in which the Muslim is taught, by Mohammed, that unless the infidel submits to Islam, he is to be killed. In fact, the entire purpose of being Muslim, according to the Koran, is total personal submission to Islam by, and throughout, forcing other human beings to submit to Islam. Intolerance by a Muslim zealot of his own deficiency of submission makes him to be much less intolerant of another Muslim's lack of submission, that can be indicative of the way ISIS fighters regard fellow Muslims who aren't living-up to their stringent expectations.

Without hesitation, these less-than-zealous Muslims are slaughtered. Therefore, it is quite evident that intolerance breeds hatred, and hatred breeds violence. Therefore, what is there for concerned American citizens to do? Well, if you, the collective American electorate, understood that a group of people from countries outside the United States were, as a band, religiously dedicated murderers; and that, if they were allowed to immigrate into the United States, they would secretly conspire to kill as many American citizens as possible with time, as their religion needed, do you allow them to input the U.S. On visas, and to eventually be naturalized as U.S.

Taxpayers? Do I hear that a concerted no? Moreover, if you understood that these people, as humans, could lie when taking the oath to get U.S. Naturalization, and might only pretend to swear to support and protect the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, could that have even greater reason to refuse their entry into the United States? You, the electorate, the People of the United or the States, as announced in the 10th Amendment of the Bill of Rights, are the real law, even for you jointly elect federal senators and representatives to represent YOUR collective will in the U.S.

Congress. In other words, the statements passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by the status U.S. President, aren't the will of the people comprising the House of Representatives, the U.S. Senate, and U.S. President, but, rather than the collective will of the People of the United States. Thus, YOU, the American People, have the obligation of ensuring that the immigration laws allowing Muslims into the United States, by the hundreds-of-thousands, are immediately tainted for the protection of the American public, the Christians, the Jews, and also all other U.S. Citizens regarded by the Muslims as infidels.

Related Papers

A Study on the Issues of Plagiarism

This section provides several definitions to the theme of freedom in the writings of phillis wheatley exemplify the most common characteristics of i. Thenticate examines the definitions of self sustaining a study on the topics of plagiarism and employing successful management theories the way it may be prevented Writers could be an overview of the book mrs dalloway by virginia woolf unaware of the ethics and copyright laws A comparison between the books animal farm and 1984 involved. APA.......Read More

Plagiarism and Its Penalties

A recent article in Times Higher Education discusses a.ariff that academics in the UK are proposing that can lay out a system of penalties for college students that plagiarize. The Tarriff proposal, that is posted in full on PlagiarismAdvice.org, states that the current penalties for plagiarism vary too much from to college around the world. "Studies in this field have found high levels of inconsistency in the penalties universities use to penalize students who are found guilty of copying, with......Read More

Plagiarism: Who's to Blame?

Ed Dante has written papers on everything from sociology to business administration to postmodern architecture. He's written papers for several levels of greater education-bachelor's degreesand master's degrees, even a Ph.D. Or 2. Can it be a jack of all trades, or maybe a scholar? No. He is a writer who makes his living writing papers in a custom-essay company. "I, that don't have any name, no opinions, and no style, have written so many papers at this point, including legal briefs,......Read More

Related Topics