# of Words: 552

I'd like for the readers to consider this question quite closely. Our Supreme Court is composed of the Chief Justice of the USA along with a number of Associate Justices that are designated by Congress. The present number of Associate Justices is put to eight according to the US Code. The power to nominate a justice lies completely the President along with the consent of the Senate.

Judges are human just like anyone else and this trait makes them less than ideal in most people's eyes. From the American social structure any qualified individual can be appointed as a judge.

It is vital to mention that the majority of these appointments are both party and coverage assignments. Regrettably, these nominations do not need to be considered one of the nation's foremost authorities in jurisprudence. Constitutionally, there exists no demand for the president to appoint the most brilliant lawyer in the nation; actually a justice need not be an attorney in any way. You hear me correct, our Constitution stipulates hardly any requirements for the position of Supreme Court Justice. Although the position is one of the maximum court designations in the nation there are small prerequisites essential for the job.

The United States constitution does not even state that the justices under consideration has to be native-born taxpayers. There are not any provisions supplied which indicates a specific era, no education necessity or profession attributes. Historically half of the 110 justices have been born out of America. These justices do not have to be attorneys or perhaps graduates of a law school. Traditionally, nevertheless our justices have had professional legal training in one manner or another. The only legal brink we encounter is a justice that is nominated has to vow to uphold and apply the royalties as put forth by our constitution.

There are numerous theories that follow this line of thinking as well. The primary theory which springs to mind is "Minimalism" argues that judges must place a wide berth upon precedent and should only make minor modifications to constitutional laws. The role of our judiciary has been debated for centuries thanks to the lack of mention of its assigned tasks within the Constitution. An understanding of the Constitution is paramount in my decision to support judicial restraint. I select this coverage because I am a firm believer that our forefathers created a document that essentially addresses the majority of the values and freedoms presented to guy.

We view these rights as fundamental and they should not be altered or changed at will. After completing the correct research, I've concluded that a judge ought to have a mix of both judicial restraint and activism. It would be foolish to side with one or the other consistently. An example, would be in which the Supreme Court once dominated our minimum wage laws infringe upon one's right to pay off our own business contracts. No judge must lie upon one side or the other of the spectrum. Too much legislative restraint is likely to duplicate decisions such as Dredd Scott v.

Sandford in which African-American's were denied equal rights. On the other hand too much judicial activism may contribute to more decisions similar to Roe v. Wade at which the decision was based upon the implied constitutional right to privacy. Copyright @2012 Joseph Parish.

Related Papers

The Minimum Wage Controversy in the United States

President Obama made a proposal to raise the minimum wage money to $9 a hour and index it in line with inflation. A commission of $9.00 a hour is not in line with inflation. This proposal was instantly looked down upon by the top Republicans including Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), that claim this brand new wage money can kill jobs and harm tiny businesses. The Uniformed Commercial Code, U.C.C., in a nutshell, defines Money as: Any other form of payment recognized by the......Read More

Minimum Wage and the Economy

Human beings are the building blocks of society. The societies agglomerate to make states. And then the nations are formed. The economy of a nation is the indicator of its prosperity. What the economy affects primarily are the people of a nation. The method, which employs the concepts of macroeconomics to achieve social goals, has been christened as welfare economics. Economics with the information, tables, chart etc. Can seem to be quite a rigorous and rigid discipline. However, the......Read More

The Minimum Wage Must Be Increased

After experiencing considerable wage earnings throughout the shared-growth decades of the new era workers have increasingly confronted labor economies of jobs that pay too much to offer a minimally decent standard of living. What we do know is that a $15 wage could have impacts on the living standards of millions of working households. Every worker should be ensured the minimum wage that will enable them to maintain a becoming normal of lifestyle for himself and his loved ones. The antidote is......Read More

Related Topics